深圳大学学报理工版

海绵城市设施种植层的介质土对径流调控、污染物去除和植物生长有重要影响. 在实际降雨情形下,对新型粒状海绵城市介质土进行径流控制与污染物去除效果进行实地监测分析. 结果表明:新型粒状海绵城市介质土的平均渗透率最低为500 mm/h,且污染物去除效果良好,固体悬浮物去除率均达80%以上,主要出水水质指标(总磷、总氮、氨氮和化学需氧量)符合地表水环境质量Ⅲ类水标准. 常绿灌木、落叶灌木和宿根地被等中国华南地区本土植物在新型介质土中均生长良好.新型粒状海绵城市介质土的经济成本核算需因地制宜,总体成本是传统介质土的1/3～3/4.与传统海绵介质土相比,新型粒状海绵城市介质土成本低廉,具有更好的渗透性和污染物去除效果,且后期运行维护便利,可广泛应用于没有重金属污染的地区,有望在一定程度上取代传统海绵城市介质土.

The growing media in the planting layer of sponge city facilities has an important influence on stormwater runoff control, pollutant removal and plant growth. This study consists of field tests that include the continuous monitoring to evaluate the performance of runoff control and pollutant removal of the innovative granular sponge city growing media during wet season. The results show that the lowest average permeability of innovative granular sponge city growing mediais 500 mm·h-1, and the pollutant removal effect is good, the removal rate of solid suspended solids is more than 80%, and the main effluent quality indexes(total nitrogen, TN; total phosphorus, TP; ammonia, NH3-N; chemical oxygen demand, COD)sampled from the outflow of the testing bioretention cells show that the water quality of discharged runoff meets the Class-Ⅲ indices of the Environmental quality standards for surface water(GB 3838—2002). Combination of local landscape plants such as evergreen shrubs, deciduous shrubs, perennial ground cover and other native plants in South China all grow well during the field tests. The overall life-cycle cost of this new type of growing media also needs to be further verified by different projects in different climate regions, generally it is 1/3-3/4 of that of traditional media. In summary, compared with the traditional sponge city media, the innovative granular sponge city growing media has better permeability and pollutantremoval effect, low cost, and convenient operationand maintenancein the later stage.It can be widely applied in areas without heavy metal pollution, and is expected to replace the traditional media to a certain extent.

引言
1 主要指标及研究手段
2 材料与方法
3 结果与讨论
4 结语

图1 实地监测选址区位<br/>Fig.1 (Color online)Location of field monitoring

图1 实地监测选址区位
Fig.1 (Color online)Location of field monitoring

图2 高位雨水花坛监测设备布置<br/>Fig.2 (Color online)Setup of field monitoring for elevated bioretention parterre

图2 高位雨水花坛监测设备布置
Fig.2 (Color online)Setup of field monitoring for elevated bioretention parterre

图3 雨水花园监测设备布置<br/>Fig.3 (Color online)Setup of field monitoring for rain garden

图3 雨水花园监测设备布置
Fig.3 (Color online)Setup of field monitoring for rain garden

表1 实地降雨监测结果<br/>Table 1 Results of rainfall monitoring

表1 实地降雨监测结果
Table 1 Results of rainfall monitoring

表2 实地降雨监测结果统计<br/>Table 2 Statistical summary of rainfall monitoring

表2 实地降雨监测结果统计
Table 2 Statistical summary of rainfall monitoring

图4 实地降雨LID流量总量与峰值监测结果<br/>Fig.4 (Color online)Results of flow monitoring during actual storm events for LID facilities

图4 实地降雨LID流量总量与峰值监测结果
Fig.4 (Color online)Results of flow monitoring during actual storm events for LID facilities

表3 实地降雨LID流量总量与峰值统计结果<br/>Table 3 Statistical summary of flow monitoring during actual storm events for LID facilities

表3 实地降雨LID流量总量与峰值统计结果
Table 3 Statistical summary of flow monitoring during actual storm events for LID facilities

图5 填充新型粒状海绵介质土的高位花坛和雨水花园的土壤含水率(体积分数)监测结果<br/>Fig.5 (Color online)Monitoring of soil moisture for bioretention parterre and rain garden with innovative granular growing media

图5 填充新型粒状海绵介质土的高位花坛和雨水花园的土壤含水率(体积分数)监测结果
Fig.5 (Color online)Monitoring of soil moisture for bioretention parterre and rain garden with innovative granular growing media

图6 高位花坛进出流水质检测比对结果<br/>Fig.6 Water quality test results of inflow and outflow of bioretention parterre

图6 高位花坛进出流水质检测比对结果
Fig.6 Water quality test results of inflow and outflow of bioretention parterre

图7 新型粒状海绵介质土对比普通种植土的植物生长情况<br/>Fig.7 (Color online)Observation of landscape healthiness for innovative granular growing media vs. ordinary normal planting soil

图7 新型粒状海绵介质土对比普通种植土的植物生长情况
Fig.7 (Color online)Observation of landscape healthiness for innovative granular growing media vs. ordinary normal planting soil

[1] LIU Jia, SAMPLE D J, CAMERON B, et al. Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban stormwater[J]. Journal ofWater,2014,6(4):1069-1099.
[2] O'NEILL S W,DAVIS A P,STRUCK S, et al. Analysis of bioretention media specifications and relationships to overall performance[C]// World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009. Kansas City, USA:[s. n.], 2009:840-848.
[3] RUNOFF V, BMPS T. Stormwater management manual for western washington: volume Ⅲ:hydrologic analysis and flow control design/BMPs[R]. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2005.
[4] Herrera Environmental Consultant Inc. Final report: 185th avenue NE bioretention stormwater treatment system performance monitoring[R]. Washington, USA:[s.n.], 2012.
[5] LOGSDON S D, SAUER P A.Nutrient leaching when compost is part of plant growth media[J].Compost Science & Utilization,Taylor & Francis,2016,24(4):238-245.
[6] BARRETT M E, LIMOUZIN M, LAWLER D F. Effect of media and plant selection on biofiltration performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 139:462- 470.
[7] WRA Environmental Consultants. Biotreatment soil media and specification: current research on trees and water quality treatment[R]. San Francisco, USA:[s.n.], 2016.
[8] LIU Jiayu, DAVIS A P. Phosphorus speciation and treatment using enhanced Phosphorus removal bioretention[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(1):607- 614.
[9] IPPOLITO J A, BARBARICK K A, ELLIOTT H. Drinking water treatment residuals: a review of recent uses[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2011,40(1):1-12.

备注

引言

1 主要指标及研究手段

2 材料与方法

3 结果与讨论

4 结语

期刊信息

备注

引言

1 主要指标及研究手段

2 材料与方法

3 结果与讨论

4 结 语

期刊信息

4 结语