赵晓晋,贺拴海,白鹭涛,等.双塔斜拉-连续梁组合体系的力学行为分析[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2016,(05):492-500.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.05492 ]
Zhao Xiaojin,He Shuanhai,Bai Lutao,et al.Mechanical behavior analysis of double-pylon cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2016,(05):492-500.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.05492 ]
双塔斜拉-连续梁组合体系的力学行为分析

长安大学公路学院,旧桥检测与加固技术交通行业重点实验室,陕西西安 710064

结构工程; 斜拉桥; 斜拉-连续梁组合体系; 力学行为; 自振频率; 刚度; 疲劳破坏; 活载; 港珠澳大桥; 青州航道桥

Mechanical behavior analysis of double-pylon cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system
Zhao Xiaojin, He Shuanhai, Bai Lutao, and Zhu Zhao

Zhao Xiaojin, He Shuanhai, Bai Lutao, and Zhu ZhaoHighway College, Key Laboratory of Bridge Detection Reinforcement Technology Ministry of Communication, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi Province, P.R.China

structural engineering; cable-stayed bridge; cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system; mechanical behavior; natural frequency; stiffness; fatigue failure; live loads; Hongkong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge; Qingzhou channel bridge

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.05492

备注

对比双塔斜拉-连续梁组合体系、双塔斜拉-简支梁组合体系以及常规双塔斜拉桥体系在恒载和活载作用下的响应以及自振特性,分析双塔斜拉-连续梁组合体系的优缺点. 结果显示,斜拉-连续梁组合体系整体刚度大,结构变形小,边锚索不易疲劳破坏,但辅助墩顶主梁断面在恒、活载作用下负弯矩大,需进行特殊设计; 斜拉-连续梁组合体系较斜拉-简支梁组合体系自振频率高,具有整体刚度强、结构受力有利的优点,但易受地震等动力作用的影响.

We analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system, by comparisons of the natural vibration characteristics and the responses under dead and live loads of double-pylon cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system, double-pylon cable-stayed-simply-supported beam combination system and common double-pylon cable-stayed bridge system. The results show that cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system has the greatest stiffness, a structure with the least deformation, and side calbles with the least probability of failing by fatigue. While the cross section of the main girder at the top of the auxiliary pier has an excessively big negative moments under the dead and live loads, thus the specific redesign is required. Compared with cable-stayed-single-supported beam combination system, cable-stayed-continuous beam combination system has a higher natural frequency, a stronger stiffness of the whole structure, and a better mechanical performance, but it is more susceptible to dynamical effects such as earthquake.

·