[1]贾富强,杨信丰,代存杰,等.考虑风险规避的出行路径选择行为分析[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2022,39(2):177-184.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.02177]
　JIA Fuqiang,YANG Xinfeng,DAI Cunjie,et al.Behavior analysis of travel route selection with consideration of risk aversion[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2022,39(2):177-184.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.02177]
点击复制

考虑风险规避的出行路径选择行为分析()
分享到：

《深圳大学学报理工版》[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

卷:
第39卷
期数:
2022年第2期
页码:
177-184
栏目:
交通物流
出版日期:
2022-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Behavior analysis of travel route selection with consideration of risk aversion
文章编号:
202202009
作者:
贾富强; 杨信丰; 代存杰; 马昌喜
兰州交通大学交通运输学院，甘肃兰州 730070
Author(s):
JIA Fuqiang; YANG Xinfeng; DAI Cunjie; and MA Changxi
School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu Province, P. R. China
关键词:
交通工程; 出行行为; 路径选择; 风险规避; 累积前景理论; 指派模型
Keywords:
transport engineering;  travel behavior;  route selection;  risk avoidance;  cumulative prospect theory;  assignment model
分类号:
U491.1
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.02177
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究智能交通系统中考虑风险规避时出行者路径选择行为，针对不同特征出行者多属性路径选择问题，利用累积前景理论描述出行者的风险规避态度，并建立考虑风险规避的出行路径多目标选择决策模型，设计基于指派模型的求解算法，通过实例对模型合理性进行检验．结果表明，出行者的风险规避对路径选择结果具有明显影响，路径选择结果随出行者对于复合阻抗和综合影响权重的不同而变化；考虑风险规避时目标的敏感性强于不考虑风险规避情形，考虑风险规避更贴近路径选择的实际情况．所建模型不仅可以研究智能交通系统中多类型出行者的多属性路径选择问题，还可作为交通流分配和网络设计等交通问题的研究基础．
Abstract:
In order to study the effect of travelers’ attitudes on route selection behavior when risk aversion is considered in intelligent transportation system, this study provides a methodology about multi-attribute route selection for travelers with different characteristics. A multi-objective decision-making model of route selection with consideration of risk aversion is established by integrating the cumulative prospect theory to describe the traveler’s risk aversion attitude and the solution algorithm based on the assignment model. A case in practice verifies the rationality of the model. The result shows that traveler’s risk aversion has a significant impact on the route selection result. The result of path selection varies with the traveler’s different composite impedance and comprehensive influence weight. The target sensitivity with consideration of risk aversion is stronger than that without consideration of risk aversion, and the consideration of risk aversion is closer to the actual situation of route selection. The proposed travel route selection decision-making model which considers risk avoidance can be used to study the problem of multi-type travelers and multi-attribute route selection in intelligent transportation system, also can be used as the basis for the study of traffic problems such as traffic flow allocation and network design.

参考文献/References:

［1］ WARDROP J G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research [J]. ICE Proceedings Engineering Divisions, 1952, 1(3): 325-362.
［2］ WILLIAMS H C W L, ORTUZAR J D. Behavioral theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2008, 16(3): 167-219.
［3］ KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk [J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292.
［4］ TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
［5］ 刘玉印，刘伟铭，吴建伟. 基于累积前景理论的出行者路径选择模型［J］.华南理工大学学报自然科学版，2010，38（7）：84-89.
LIU Yuyin, LIU Weiming, WU Jianwei. Route choice model of traveler based on cumulative prospect theory [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology Natural Science Edition, 2010, 38(7): 84-89.(in Chinese)
［6］ 王倩，周晶，徐薇. 基于累积前景理论考虑路网通行能力退化的用户均衡模型［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2013，33（6）：1563-1569.
WANG Qian, ZHOU Jing, XU Wei. A user equilibrium model based on the cumulative prospect theory for a degradable transport network [J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(6): 1563-1569.(in Chinese)
［7］ 田丽君，黄海军，许岩. 具有异质参考点的多用户网络均衡模型［J］. 管理科学学报，2014，17（7）：1-9.
TIAN Lijun, HUANG Haijun, XU Yan. Modeling the multi-class network equilibrium for travelers with heterogeneous reference points [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2014, 17(7): 1-9.(in Chinese)
［8］ YANG Jufen, JIANG Guiyan. Development of an enhanced route choice model based on cumulative prospect theory [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 47: 168-178.
［9］ 张薇，何瑞春. 基于前景理论的居民出行方式选择［J］. 计算机应用，2014，34（3）：749-753.
ZHANG Wei, HE Ruichun. Residents travel mode choice based on prospect theory [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2014, 34(3): 749-753.(in Chinese)
［10］ 李小静，刘林忠. 基于累积前景理论的通勤者路径选择模型［J］.交通运输系统工程与信息，2015，15（1）：173-178.
LI Xiaojing, LIU Linzhong. Route choice model for commuters based on cumulative prospect theory [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(1):173-178. (in Chinese)
［11］ 田丽君，杨茜，黄海军，等. 基于累积前景理论的出行方式选择模型及实证［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2016，36（7）：1778-1785.
TIAN Lijun, YANG Qian, HUANG Haijun, et al. The cumulative prospect theory based travel mode choice model and its empirical verification [J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(7): 1778-1785.(in Chinese)
［12］ LI B, HENSHER D A. Risky weighting in discrete choice [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 102: 1-21.
［13］ GHADER S, DARZI A, ZHANG L. Modeling effects of travel time reliability on mode choice using cumulative prospect theory [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 108: 245-254.
［14］ 陈京荣，俞建宁，李引珍. 一种多属性条件下的交通网络路径选择模型［J］.运筹与管理，2009，18（2）：7-10.
CHEN Jingrong, YU Jianning, LI Yinzhen. Route choice model with multi-attributes in traffic network [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2009, 18(2): 7-10. (in Chinese)
［15］ 徐红利，周晶，徐薇. 基于累积前景理论的随机网络用户均衡模型［J］. 管理科学学报，2011，14（7）：1-7.
XU Hongli, ZHOU Jing, XU Wei. Cumulative prospect theory-based user equilibrium model for stochastic network [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011, 14(7): 1-7.(in Chinese)
［16］ 龙琼，胡列格，张谨帆，等. 不确定性环境下个性化路径选择的多属性决策方法［J］.中国公路学报，2014，27（9）：105-110.
LONG Qiong, HU Liege, ZHANG Jinfan, et al. Multi-attribute decision-making for personalized route selection under uncertain condition [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(9): 105-110.(in Chinese)
［17］ 龙琼，曾革，喻杰，等. 基于客观自主式决策方法的个性化最优路径选择［J］. 长安大学学报自然科学版，2014，34（5）：146-151.
LONG Qiong, ZENG Ge, YU Jie, et al. Personalized optimal route selection based on objective and autonomic decision method [J]. Journal of Chang’an University Natural Science Edition, 2014, 34(5): 146-151.(in Chinese)
［18］ 陈海鹏，刘陪，申铉京，等. 实时环境下多目标的路径选择模型［J］.哈尔滨工程大学学报，2017，38（8）：1285-1292.
CHEN Haipeng, LIU Pei, SHEN Xuanjing, et al. Route choice model based on multi-objective in a real-time environment [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2017, 38(8): 1285-1292.(in Chinese)
［19］ 黄天伊，周晨静，王益. 驾驶行为特性对道路通行能力影响的量化研究［J］. 交通信息与安全，2018，36（4）：87-95.
HUANG Tianyi, ZHOU Chenjing, WANG Yi. A quantitative study of influence of characteristics of driving behaviors on road traffic capacity [J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2018, 36(4): 87-95.(in Chinese)
［20］ 黄合来，蒋梦曦，韩春阳，等. 基于安全可靠性的多类用户交通分配模型［J］.中国公路学报，2018，31（4）：312-321.
HUANG Helai, JIANG Mengxi, HAN Chunyang, et al. Traffic assignment method for multiclass users considering safety reliability [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(4): 312-321. (in Chinese)
［21］ 张惠玲，陈华伟，敖谷昌. 基于级差效益的驾驶员个性化路径选择［J］.公路交通科技，2019，36（7）：114-120.
ZHANG Huiling, CHEN Huawei, AO Guchang. Driver’s personalized route choice based on differential benefit [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 36(7): 114-120.(in Chinese)
［22］ WITT M, KOMPA? K, WANG L, et al. Driver profiling-data-based identification of driver behavior dimensions and affecting driver characteristics for multi-agent traffic simulation [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 64: 361-376.
［23］ 乐琦，樊治平. 基于累积前景理论的双边匹配决策方法［J］. 系统工程学报，2013，28（1）：38-46.
YUE Qi, FAN Zhiping. Decision method for two-side matching based on cumulative prospect theory [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2013, 28(1): 38-46.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]陈娇娜,张生瑞,靳引利.高速公路行程时间可靠性的小波密度估计[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2016,33(4):432.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.04432]
　Chen Jiaona,Zhang Shengrui,and Jin Yinli.Highway travel time reliability modeling based on wavelet density estimation[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2016,33(2):432.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.04432]
[2]杨少伟,赖泓志,潘兵宏,等.高速公路主线相互合流至出口最小间距的研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2018,35(6):643.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2018.06643]
　YANG Shaowei,LAI Hongzhi,PAN Binghong,et al.Minimum spacing between the mainline of highway mutual confluence and the mainline exit[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2018,35(2):643.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2018.06643]
[3]潘兵宏,等.新型非常规U型转弯交叉口的运行效率研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2020,37(3):305.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2020.03305]
　PAN Binghong,SHAN Huimin,REN Hui,et al.Operational efficiency of new unconventional U-turn intersection[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2020,37(2):305.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2020.03305]
[4]潘兵宏,等.新型立体环形交叉口的运行效率研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2020,37(6):630.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2020.06630]
　PAN Binghong,ZHOU Tingwen,et al.Operational efficiency of new stereo roundabouts[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2020,37(2):630.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2020.06630]
[5]潘兵宏,刘娟,柴虎,等.苜蓿叶立交集散车道连续入出口最小间距研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2022,39(3):305.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.03305]
　PAN Binghong,LIU Juan,CHAI Hu,et al.Minimum spacing of continuous entrance and exit on the collector-distributor road of alfalfa leaf interchange[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2022,39(2):305.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.03305]
[6]李霞,郭梦婷,张孝铭,等.基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员跟驰意向分析[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2023,40(1):118.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2023.01118]
　LI Xia,GUO Mengting,ZHANG Xiaoming,et al.Analysis of driver’s car-following intention based on extended planning behavior theory[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2023,40(2):118.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2023.01118]
[7]何民,曹昆,何明卫,等.老年人活动空间的测度及影响因素——以昆明市为例[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2023,40(2):188.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2023.02188]
　HE Min,CAO Kun,HE Mingwei,et al.Influencing factors and measure of the activity space of the elderly: a case study of Kunming city[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2023,40(2):188.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2023.02188]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received: 2021-01-26; Accepted: 2021-04-10; Online (CNKI): 2021-08-17
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China (71761024, 71861023); Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (20JR5RA422); Youth Scientific Research Fund Project of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (2020031)
Corresponding author: Lecturer JIA Fuqiang.E-mail: jiafuqiang@mail.lzjtu.cn
Citation: JIA Fuqiang, YANG Xinfeng, DAI Cunjie, et al.Behavior analysis of travel route selection with consideration of risk aversion [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2022, 39(2): 177-184.(in Chinese)
基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目（71761024，71861023）；甘肃省自然科学基金资助项目（20JR5RA422）；兰州交通大学青年科学研究基金资助项目（2020031）
作者简介：贾富强（1989—），兰州交通大学讲师、博士．研究方向：交通运输系统管理与优化．E-mail: jiafuqiang@mail.lzjtu.cn
引 文：引用格式:贾富强，杨信丰，代存杰，等.考虑风险规避的出行路径选择行为分析［J］.深圳大学学报理工版，2022，39（2）：177-184.
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-30