Liu Ruixue and Peng Yuanyuan.Evaluation of plant landscape in the seaside green land based on public perception[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2017,34(4):385-392.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.04385]





Evaluation of plant landscape in the seaside green land based on public perception
深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院,广东深圳 518060
Liu Ruixue and Peng Yuanyuan
College of Architecture and Urban Plan, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, P.R.China
landscape design plant landscape landscape evaluation public perception scenic beauty estimation method seaside green land
TU 986
以深圳湾滨海公园为例,采用美景度评价法,研究公众对城市滨海绿地植物景观的审美感知. 构建植物景观评价体系,建立评价模型,分析美景度与景观要素的相关性,找出影响城市滨海绿地植物景观公众审美偏好的主要因素. 结果表明,公众与专业人员在植物景观的审美偏好上具有明显的一致性,影响公众审美偏好的8个景观要素为植物生长状况、乡土性、覆盖度、季相变化、层次性、亲水性、可达性和公共服务设施. 在此基础上探讨了提升城市滨海绿地植物景观质量的方法与途径.
Taking the Shenzhen Bay Park as an example, we analyze the public perception of the plant landscape in seaside green land by the scenic beauty estimation method. We build the landscape evaluation system and evaluation model to analyze the correlation between the scenic beauty estimates and the landscape factors, and find out the major factors influencing the plant landscape in seaside parks. There is a clear consensus about the aesthetic preference of the plant landscape between the public and professionals. Public aesthetic is influenced by eight landscape factors. They are situation of plant growth, native, coverage, plant season change, layer of structure, hydrophilic, accessibility, and situation of public service facilities. We discuss the approaches to improving the quality of plant landscape.


[1] Raymond M C, Gottwald S, Kuoppa J, et al. Integrating multiple elements of environmental justice into urban blue space planning using public participation geographic information systems[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2016, 153: 198-208.
[2] Faehnle M, Bcklund P, Tyrvinen L, et al. How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case finland[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2014, 130: 171-183.
[3] Palliwoda J, Kowarik I, Lippe M. Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: the species level matters[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2017, 157: 394-406.
[4] Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation[J]. Ambio, 2014, 43(4): 413-433.
[5] Dunn R, Gavin M C, Sanchez M C, et al. The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature[J]. Conservation Biology, 2006, 20(6): 1814-1816.
[6] 苏雪痕. 植物景观规划设计[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2012.
Su Xuehen. Landscape design with plants[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing, 2012.(in Chinese)
[7] Vollmer D, Prescott M F, Padawangi R, et al. Understanding the value of urban riparian corridors: considerations in planning for cultural services along an Indonesian river[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015, 138:144-154.
[8] Dobbie M F. Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning , 2013, 120: 178-189.
[9] Brown G, Brabyn L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2012, 107(3): 317-331.
[10] 王晋芳. 城市景观评价中公众参与研究[D].天津: 天津大学, 2011.
Wang Jinfang. Study on public participation in the urban landscape evaluation[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2011.(in Chinese)
[11] 许晨阳, 刘雪梅. 基于公众视角的植物景观评价研究:以天津五大道地区为例[J]. 山东林业科技, 2016(1): 52-57.
Xu Chenyang, Liu Xuemei. Evaluation of plant landscape in public perspective: take Tianjin Five Avenue for instance[J]. Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2016(1): 52-57.(in Chinese)
[12] Caula S, Hvenegaard G T, Marty P. The influence of bird information, attitudes, and demographics on public preferences toward urban green spaces: the case of Montpellier, France[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2009, 8(2): 117-128.
[13] 杨玉萍. 城市近自然园林的营建与公众认知:以武汉市为例[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2011.
Yang Yuping. Construction and public perception of urban nature-approximating landscape architecture: the case study of Wuhan city[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011.(in Chinese)
[14] 许大为, 李羽佳. 基于SD-SBE法的专家与公众审美差异研究[J]. 中国园林, 2014(7): 52-56.
Xu Dawei, Li Yujia. Experts and public aesthetic differences based on SD-SBE method[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2014(7): 52-56.(in Chinese)
[15] 千茜, 王涛, 肖洁舒,等. 深圳进入“湾”时代:深圳湾公园景观设计解析[J]. 风景园林, 2011(4): 32-37.
Qian qian, Wang Tao, Xiao Jieshu, et al.Shenzhen’s bay era: landscape design for Shenzhen bay park[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2011(4): 32-37.(in Chinese)
[16] Schroeder H, Daniel T C. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes[J]. Forest Science, 1981, 27(1): 71-80.
[17] Shuttleworth S. The use of photographs as an environment presentation medium in landscape studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1980, 11(1): 61-76.
[18] 李冠衡. 从园林植物景观评价的角度探讨植物造景艺术[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2010.
Li Guanheng. Study on plant landscaping art from the perspective of plant landscape evaluation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2010.(in Chinese)
[19] Daniel T C, Boster R S. Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method[M]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO., 1976.
[20] Daniel T C, Michael M M. Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest of vistas[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(1):61-72.
[21] Shuttleworth S. The use of photographs as an environment presentation medium in landscape studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1980, 11(1): 61-76.
[22] Daniel T C, Vining J. Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality[C]// Behavior and the nature environment. New York, USA: Plenum Press. 1983, 1(6): 39-84.
[23] Itami R M. Research and application in US visual management systems[C]// Scenic perception: in Canadian Western Geographic Series. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, 1986.
[24] 芦建国,李舒仪.公园植物景观综合评价方法及其应用[J].南京林业大学学报自然科学版, 2009, 33(6): 139-142.
Lu Jianguo, Li Shuyi. Study on the synthetical assessment of park plant landscape and its application[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University Natural Science Edition, 2009, 33(6): 139-142.(in Chinese)
[25] 李华威, 穆博, 康艳,等. 公园绿地植物景观综合评价与实证研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2015, 49(6): 838-841.
Li Huawei, Mu Bo, Kang Yan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and empirical study of the plant landscape in park green space[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2015, 49(6): 838-841.(in Chinese)
[26] 黄广远. 北京市城区城市森林结构及景观美学评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2012.
Huang Guangyuan. Studies on species composition and landscape aesthetics evaluation of urban forest in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.(in Chinese)


 LIN Yan and HUANG Jun.Renovation of ecological landscape of waterfront[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2011,28(4):373.
 Chen Yiyong.Influential factors of the amount of community open space activity[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2016,33(4):180.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.02180]


Foundation:National Key Technology R & D Program(2012BAC06B03); Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University(201539)
Corresponding author:Lecturer Liu Ruixue.E-mail: lrxrainbow@szu.edu.cn
Citation:Liu Ruixue, Peng Yuanyuan. Evaluation of plant landscape in the seaside green land based on public perception[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2017, 34(4): 385-392.(in Chinese)
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAC06B03); 深圳大学校级科研启动资助项目(201539)
作者简介:刘瑞雪,女,深圳大学讲师、博士.研究方向:风景园林规划与设计. E-mail:lrxrainbow@szu.edu.cn
引文:刘瑞雪,彭媛媛. 基于公众感知的城市滨海绿地植物景观评价[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(4):385-392.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-26