[1]易俊.逆向供应链群体演化的Stackelberg博弈分析[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2013,30(No.1(001-110)):103-108.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.01103]
 Yi Jun.Stakelberg game analysis of reverse supply chain with group evolutionary characteristic[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2013,30(No.1(001-110)):103-108.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.01103]
点击复制

逆向供应链群体演化的Stackelberg博弈分析()
分享到:

《深圳大学学报理工版》[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2013年No.1(001-110)
页码:
103-108
栏目:
交通物流
出版日期:
2013-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Stakelberg game analysis of reverse supply chain with group evolutionary characteristic
作者:
易俊
暨南大学财务与国有资产管理处,广州 510632
Author(s):
Yi Jun
Department of Finance and State-owned Assets Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, P.R.China
关键词:
供应链 博弈论 逆向物流 演化算法 演化博弈 斯塔克伯格博弈 废品回收 个体商贩群
Keywords:
supply chain game theory reverse logistics evolutionary computation evolutionary game Stackelberg game recycling waste itinerant traders group
分类号:
F 205
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.01103
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
建立具有群体演化特征的逆向供应链斯塔克伯格(Stakelberg)博弈模型,分析逆向供应链上游制造商或回收厂的机会主义行为,指出“幼稚”的下游个体商贩群体面临分拣、未加处理和掺杂3种回收策略,并与“老练”的上游制造商进行价格竞争.仿真分析表明,若制造商或回收厂遵守按质论价的口头协议,则双方演化稳定均衡为帕累托最优;若制造商或回收厂为“机会主义”行为类型,则演化稳定均衡结果取决于个体商贩中采取分拣策略所占比例大小.
Abstract:
The itinerant traders and their family workshops become the mainly recycle models of Chinese reverse supply chain. The Stackelberg game model of reverse supply chain is built considering the group evolutionary characteristic. The itinerant traders are the puerile group facing three strategies, i.e., the sorting, the untreated and the adulteration, and the manufacture/recovery plant is the experienced individual player taken the second action. Both groups make the price competition. The results show that the evolutionary equilibrium result of reverse supply chain is the sorting and the higher recycling price, if the manufacture/recovery plant obeys the oral contract of pricing by quality. However, if the manufacture/recovery plant takes the opportunism behavior, the evolutionary equilibrium result depends on the itinerant traders sharing the proportion size of the sorting strategy.

参考文献/References:

[1] Prahinski C, Kocabasoglu C. Empirical research opportunities in reverse supply chains[J]. Omega, 2006, 34(6): 519-532.
[2] Guide J V, Van Wassenhove L N. The reverse supply chain[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(2):25-26.
[3] Enslow B. Internet Fulfillment: The Next Supply Chain Frontier[EB/OL]. http://enslow.ASCET.com, 2002.
[4] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 239-252.
[5] Gu Qiaolun, Gao Tiegang, Shi Lianshuan. Price decision analysis for reverse supply chain based on game theory[J]. Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, 2005, 25(3):20-25.(in Chinese)
顾巧论,高铁杠,石连栓.基于博弈论的逆向供应链定价策略分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(3):20-25.
[6] Huang Zuqing, Da Qingli. Optimal strategies of inventory control based on two recovery modes[J]. Journal of Southeast University Natural Science Edition, 2005, 35(2):302-307.(in Chinese)
黄祖庆,达庆利.基于逆向物流定期和定量处理的最优库存控制策略研究[J]. 东南大学学报自然科学版, 2005, 35(2):302-307.
[7] Wei Jie, Li Jun. The choice of different take-back models in reverse logistics with the restriction of EPR[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005, 13(6):18-22.(in Chinese)
魏洁,李军.ERP下的逆向物流回收模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2005, 13(6):18-22.
[8] Shen Liang, Wang Yuyan. Research on evolutionary game of reverse supply chain[J]. Management Review, 2009, 21(1):124-128.(in Chinese)
申亮,王玉燕.逆向供应链的演化博弈研究[J]. 管理评论, 2009, 21(1):124-128.
[9] Liu Dehai,Wang Weiguo,Wang Xun.Information screening model of choosing VMI cooperator in incomplete information[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2009,18(2): 46-54.(in Chinese)
刘德海,王维国,王迅.不完全信息下选择供应链VMI合作伙伴的信息甄别模型[J]. 运筹与管理,2009,18(2):46-54.
[10] Yi Jun, Wang Susheng. Evolutionary game model of multiple recycling modes of reverse supply chain[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2012, 29(2): 183-188.(in Chinese)
易俊, 王苏生. 多样化逆向供应链回收模式演化博弈模型[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2012,29(2):183-188.
[11] Liu Dehai, Xu Yinfeng, Li Chunqing. An analysis of a game problem analyze between individual and group[J]. Systems Engineering, 2004, 22(12): 6-9.(in Chinese)
刘德海, 徐寅峰, 李纯青.个体与群体之间的一类博弈问题分析[J]. 系统工程, 2004, 22(12): 6-9.
[12] Maynard S J. Evolution and the Theory of Games[M]. Cambridge(UK):Cambridge University Press, 1982: 25-34.
[13] Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1985: 45-53.

相似文献/References:

[1]林旭东,李丽.不同信息结构下供应链订购批量模型研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2004,21(2):155.
 LIN Xu-dong and LI Li.Studies on order lot models of supply chain under different information structures [J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2004,21(No.1(001-110)):155.
[2]李乃文,崔学兴,李丹,等.有限需求信息下供应链生产与订货的决策研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(2):204.
 Li Naiwen,Cui Xuexing,Li Dan,et al. Production and ordering decision-makinginsupply chain under limited demand information[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2017,34(No.1(001-110)):204.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received:2012-06-09;Accepted:2012-12-05
Foundation:National Natural Science Foundation of China (70872039)
Corresponding author:Associate professor Yi Jun. E-mail: yijundoctor@126.com
Citation:Yi Jun. Stakelberg game analysis of reverse supply chain with group evolutionary characteristic[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2013, 30(1): 103-108.(in Chinese)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872039)
作者简介:易俊(1965-),男(汉族),湖北省洪湖市人,暨南大学副研究员、博士.E-mail:yijundoctor@126.com
引文:易俊. 逆向供应链群体演化的Stackelberg博弈分析[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2013,30(1):103-108.
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-01-20