|Table of Contents|

Minimum spacing of continuous entrance and exit on the collector-distributor road of alfalfa leaf interchange(PDF)

Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

Issue:
2022 Vol.39 No.3(237-362)
Page:
305-313
Research Field:
Transportation Logistics

Info

Title:
Minimum spacing of continuous entrance and exit on the collector-distributor road of alfalfa leaf interchange
Author(s):
PAN Binghong LIU Juan CHAI Hu LI Xiang and ZHANG Ranyang
School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi Province, P. R. China
Keywords:
traffic engineering alfalfa leaf interchange collector-distributor road continuous entrance and exit weaving minimum spacing VisSim simulation
PACS:
U491;U412
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2022.03305
Abstract:
The spacing between the same side of entrance and downstream exit (continuous entrance and exit) of the interchange has not yet specified in the highway route design specification (JTG D20—2017). When the spacing is small, the interweaved traffic flow affects each other, which not only reduces the traffic capacity, but also affects the traffic safety. In this paper, the collector-distributor road is set in the main line of alfalfa leaf interchange. By analyzing the operation characteristics of vehicles in this area, we obtain the calculation model of minimum spacing of continuous entrance and exit, and determine the key parameters such as the weaving type and the vehicle speed of the weaving area according to ’China Highway Capacity Manual’. Then we calculate the length and saturation of weaving area and examine the length and service level of weaving area. Finally we propose the recommended minimum spacing of continuous entrance and exit of alfalfa leaf interchange. We use the VisSim software to build the traffic simulation model of continuous entrance and exit section, take the conflict rate as the safety evaluation index, and evaluate the simulation conflict rate of the recommended minimum spacing under different design speed combinations. The evaluation results show that the safety levels of the recommended minimum spacing of entrance and exit are safe, relatively safe or criticality safe, indicating that the recommended spacing is reasonable. The research results can provide a reference for the design of continuous entrance and exit on the collector-distributor road of alfalfa leaf interchange, and help to improve the revelent specifications and design rules.

References:

[1] 颉骥,何柏青. 高速公路交通事故主要成因分析及解决方案研究[J]. 交通与运输:学术版,2013(12):144-146.
XIE Ji, HE Baiqing. Major causes of highway accidents and solutions analysis [J]. Traffic and Transportation: Academic Edition, 2013(12): 144-146. (in Chinese)
[2] TORBIC D J, HARWOOD D W, GILMORE D K, et al. Safety analysis of interchanges [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2009(2092): 39-47.
[3] JANSON B N, AWAD W, ROBLES J, et al. Truck accidents at freeway ramps: data analysis and high-risk site identification [J]. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1998, 1 (1): 75-92.
[4] BAUER K M, HARWOOD D W. Statistical models of accidents on interchange ramps and speed-change lanes [R/OL]. (1998-06-03)[2021-04-02]. https://trid.trb.org/view/1998/M/484781.
[5] JTG D20—2017 公路路线设计规范[S].
JTG D20—2017 Design specification for highway alignment [S].(in Chinese)
[6] ASSTHO. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets [S].
[7] 日本道路协会. 日本公路技术标准的解说与运用[M]. 王治中,张文魁,冯理堂,译. 北京:人民交通出版社,1980:99-101.
Japanese Road Association. Interpretation and application of Japanese highway technical standards [M].WANG Zhizhong,ZHANG Wenkui,FENG Litang,transl.Beijing:China Communications Press, 1980: 99-101.(in Chinese)
[8] 邵阳,潘兵宏,王云泽. 高速公路互通式立交连续出口和入口间距研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(8):1642-1651.
SHAO Yang, PAN Binghong, WANG Yunze. Study on adjacent exit and entrance distance of freeway interchanges [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(8): 1642-1651.(in Chinese)
[9] 王灵利,李新伟,潘兵宏,等. 高速公路主线侧连续出口最小间距研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(4):626-631.
WANG Lingli, LI Xinwei, PAN Binghong. Study on minimum distance of the highway line-side continuous export [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(4): 626-631.(in Chinese)
[10] 潘兵宏,余小龙. 高速公路主线同侧连续入口最小间距研究[J]. 公路,2017,62(6):1-7.
PAN Binghong, YU Xiaolong. Study on minimum distance of the highway line-side continuous entrance [J]. Highway, 2017, 62(6): 1-7.(in Chinese)
[11] 孙剑,胡家琦,孙杰. 城市快速路交织区通行能力估计模型[J]. 中国公路学报,2016,29(4):114-122.
SUN Jian, HU Jiaqi, SUN Jie. Capacity estimation model of urban expressway weaving area [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(4): 114-122.(in Chinese)
[12] 孟祥燕. 高等级道路交织区通行能力研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2006.
MENG Xiangyan. Research on capacity of expressway weaving sections [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2006.(in Chinese)
[13] 丁华磊. 互通式立交集散车道设置条件研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2011.
DING Hualei. Study on the collector-distributor road in the interchanges on freeway [D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2011.(in Chinese)
[14] 李璨,陈雨人,邢小亮. 复合式互通立交集散道交织区优化与安全评价[J]. 公路工程,2018,43(5):120-125.
LI Can, CHEN Yuren, XING Xiaoliang. Optimization and safety evaluation of weaving area of collector-distributor road in composite interchange [J]. Highway Engineering, 2018, 43(5): 120-125.(in Chinese)
[15] 袁愈锋. 高速公路苜蓿叶立交集散车道车辆运行速度和技术指标研究[D]. 衡阳:南华大学,2018.
YUAN Yufeng. Study on vehicle running velocity and technical indexes on collector-distributor lane of cloverleaf interchanges on freeway [D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2018.(in Chinese)
[16] Transportation Research Board. Highway capacity manual [S].
[17] BARED J G, EDARA P K, KIM T. Safety impact of interchange spacing on urban freeways [C]// Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington D C: TRID, 2006: 2070.
[18] AHAMMED M A, HASSAN Y, SAYED T A. Modeling driver behavior and safety on freeway merging areas [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(9): 370-377.
[19] EL-BASHA R, HASSAN Y, SAYED T. Modeling freeway diverging behavior on deceleration lanes [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2012(1): 30-37.
[20] KONDYLI A, ELEFTERIADOU L. Modeling driver behavior at freeway-ramp merges [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2249(1): 29-37.
[21] 周荣贵,钟连德. 公路通行能力手册[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2017:62-76.
ZHOU Ronggui, ZHONG Liande. China highway capacity manual [M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2017:62-76.(in Chinese)
[22] JTGT D21—2014 公路立体交叉设计细则[S].
JTGT D21—2014 Guidelines for design of highway grade-separated intersections [S].(in Chinese)
[23] 日本道路公团. 日本高速公路设计要领[M]. 交通部工程管理司,译. 西安:陕西旅游出版社,1991.
Japanese Road Corporation. Essentials of Japanese highway design [M]. Department of Management Engineering of Ministry of Transport, transl. Xi’an: Shannxi Travel Press, 1991.(in Chinese)
[24] 冯玉荣,杨少伟,杨宏志,等. 高速公路交织区运行分析方法对比研究[J]. 公路交通科技,2018,35(8):134-143,158.
FENG Yurong, YANG Shaowei, YANG Hongzhi, et al. Comparative study on operation analysis methods of expressway weaving area [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research Development, 2018, 35(8): 134-143, 158.(in Chinese)
[25] 蒋飞. 互通式交叉匝道连续出入口最小间距研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2018.
JIANG Fei. Reaserch on minimum spacing ramp successive exit and entrance [D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2018.(in Chinese)
[26] 许源. 立交交织区交通安全、效率与干预研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学,2007.
XU Yuan. Study on traffic safety, efficiency and intervention in weaving area of interchange [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-